�山����

The UNDT found that it does not have jurisdiction to review the medical opinion expressed by the Medical Services Division, as requested by the Applicant, and dismissed the application in its entirety. Procedure for challenging a decision taken pursuant to Appendix D: A claimant may either challenge a decision taken by the Secretary-General upon recommendation from the ABCC by seeking reconsideration under art. 17 of Appendix D or by appealing it before the Dispute Tribunal. However, the two avenues offer different prospects. Reconsideration under art. 17 of Appendix D: The reconsideration procedure under art. 17 of Appendix D essentially provides for a review of the medical aspects of the case, through the constitution of a medical board composed of three medical practitioners qualified to make expert recommendations to the ABCC. Judicial review of decisions taken pursuant to Appendix D: The Dispute Tribunal shall examine whether the proper procedure had been followed but it cannot put itself in the place of a medical expert or the decision-maker. The Dispute Tribunal is not competent to make medical findings.