Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2017/024

UNDT/2017/024, Porter

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The application was receivable as it was filed in accordance with the requirements set forth in article 12.3 of the UNDT Statute and article 30 of the UNDT RoP.; The payment of salaries to the Applicant should have been calculated as of the time of separation (30 November 2009) with accrued interest.; UNDT ordered that the Secretary-General add a pre-judgment interest on the compensation already paid, calculated at the US Prime Rate applicable on 30 November 2009 (date of separation) to 9 December 2016 (date of payment). All other pleas were refused.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant filed an application challenging three issues that arose from the circumstances of a prolonged medical leave that spanned a period of more than two years: 1) A decision taken by the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) administration to keep him on medical leave for more than two years after his doctors had recommended that he was fit to return to work; 2) During the period of his forced medical leave, the Administration ignored his pleas for information and misled him thereby causing him untold stress and hardship; and 3) Failure by the Administration to reimburse financial claims that accrued to him as a result of the forced medical leave.

Legal Principle(s)

When calculating the quantum of compensation, it must be set as of the date of the breach of the staff member’s contractual rights and not the date of judgment.

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

The Respondent was ordered to pay pre-judgment interest on the compensation already paid.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Porter
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type