UNDT/2018/047

UNDT/2018/047, Khisa

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

While the Applicant was not required to request management evaluation before filing this application, she was, however, required to file her application with UNDT within; 90 calendar days of receiving the contested decision. The Applicant’s 25 March 2018 motion for waiver failed to comply with the stringent requirement pronounced by the Appeal’s Tribunal in Thiam because it was not filed prior to the filing of her substantive application but more than five months after the fact. Additionally, the Applicant’s passing mention of receivability in her 17 October 2017 application cannot be construed as a motion for waiver because it contravened the ruling in Nikwigize. She received the letter of 15 December 2016 imposing disciplinary sanction on her on 20 December 2016. She brought this application only on 17 October 2017 – nearly five months after her discharge from hospital.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant challenged the decision to impose on her the disciplinary measure of separation from service with compensation, and the recovery of 2,822.37 South Sudanese Pounds from her final entitlements.

Legal Principle(s)

A staff member contesting an administrative decision taken pursuant to advice obtained from technical bodies or to impose a disciplinary or non-disciplinary measure pursuant to staff rule 10.2 is not required to request management evaluation.; The Appeals Tribunal has consistently held that the Dispute Tribunal must “recognize, respect and abide by” the jurisprudence of the Appeals Tribunal because the principle of stare decisis creates foreseeable and predictable results within the internal justice system.This Tribunal is bound to apply the Appeals Tribunal’s pronouncements in Thiam and Nikwigize strictly. The Appeals Tribunal has consistently and strictly enforced the time limits for filing applications and appeals simply because strict adherence to filing deadlines assures the timely hearing of cases and rendering of judgments. An applicant is required to file a motion or application for suspension, waiver, or extension of time limit before he/she files a substantive application with the Dispute Tribunal. He/she cannot file the motion for suspension, waiver, or extension of time limit as part of his/her substantive application or afterwards.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Khisa
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type