UNDT/2020/005

UNDT/2020/005, Simiyu

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that the Applicant identified the contested decision as “misconduct allegations” made against her. It was clear that the Administration was yet to take a decision whether or not to discipline her. Allegations of misconduct are only a prefatory act, from which no direct consequences stem for the terms of the Applicant’s employment. Accordingly, the application was found not receivable for want of a reviewable administrative decision and it was dismissed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested what she termed as “misconduct allegations” against her.

Legal Principle(s)

As per the settled jurisprudence, initiating an investigation is not an administrative decision which the Tribunal is competent to review under art. 2.1 of its Statute. It is merely a step in the investigative process. Accordingly, the Tribunal is not competent to entertain complaints against decisions that are not final and conclusive in the administrative course of procedure.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable
Outcome Extra Text

The application was found not receivable for want of a reviewable administrative decision.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Simiyu
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type