UNDT/2020/027 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

UNDT/2020/027, Prada

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant missed the 90-day deadline to file the application which is, therefore, time-barred.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Decision concerning benefits and entitlements.

Legal Principle(s)

A party may move for summary judgment when there is no dispute as to the material facts of the case and a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Time limits for filing applications should be strictly enforced and that the degree of lateness is irrelevant in deciding whether or not an application was filed timely.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Prada

Entity

UNS

Case Number(s)

UNDT/NY/2020/004

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry Location :

New York