UNDT/2020/161

UNDT/2020/161, Batra

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Applicant’s performance appraisal was fair and supported by the facts in evidence. The Administration was justified in deciding not to extend the Applicant’s temporary appointment for poor performance. There was no justification to extend the Applicant’s appointment beyond the maximum 364 days. The Applicant filed a complaint of harassment after she had received the request for management evaluation. She was therefore not able to show a link between her complaint and the decision not to renew her appointment given that the decision occurred months before the filing of the complaint. There is no evidence that the contested decisions were influenced by the Applicant having voiced concerns of alleged misconduct ion in her division prior to the contested decisions.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Decision not to renew the Applicant’s temporary appointment and the decision to place her latest performance appraisal in her personnel file.

Legal Principle(s)

Temporary appointments do not carry expectancy of renewal, irrespective of length of service. Where performance is the reason provided for the decision not to extend the applicant’s appointment, the Administration is required to provide a performance-related justification for its decision. In reviewing the Administration’s appraisal of a staff member’s performance, the Dispute Tribunal may not review such appraisal de novo, substituting its judgment for that of the Administration.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Batra

Entity

DGACM

Case Number(s)

UNDT/NY/2019/052

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry Location :

New York