Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2021/038, Mousa

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal observed that the Applicant was a staff member of UNRWA and contested a decision purportedly taken by that agency. The Tribunal further recalled that UNRWA does not fall under the jurisdiction of UNDT. Accordingly, the Applicant had no locus standi before the Tribunal. The Application was thus dismissed as non-receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested what he described as a cover up of administrative corruption represented by no response from the Commissioner General of UNRWA to the reported misconduct by the Office of Internal Oversight Services.

Legal Principle(s)

The Tribunal is competent to hear applications filed by staff members from entities that fall under its jurisdiction. Further, the Tribunal is competent to adjudicate the merits only where the receivability requirement is satisfied.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Mousa
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Document Topic/Theme :