UNDT/2021/067

UNDT/2021/067, Belsito

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Not only is it the duty of every member of the United Nations personnel to cooperate with the Internal Justice System, but also it is particularly important for senior leaders of the Organization to lead by example. There is no evidence that a selection decision had been made in the first selection exercise before it was cancelled. The cancellation was based on facts supported by evidence and, therefore, it was lawful. The Applicant’s allegations of ulterior motive have no bearing on the decision to cancel the first selection process because the reasons given were lawful. The Applicant’s claim that the second selection process was void ab initio due to the unlawful cancellation of the first selection process has no merit because the cancellation of the first selection process was lawful. The Applicant’s allegations that one of the officials involved in the second selection process had a conflict of interest because he was involved in the unlawfully cancelled first selection process is without merit because said official was not involved in the cancellation decision.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Cancellation of the selection process for the post of 山Women Regional Director for Europe and Central Asia at the D-1 level (“fist selection process”) and non-selection for the subsequently readvertised post (“second selection process”).

Legal Principle(s)

The Administration is not under an obligation to pursue a recruitment procedure once begun, and it is within its discretionary authority to terminate a recruitment procedure and/or to initiate a new one for sound reasons, such as on account of irregularities which occurred in the process. If an applicant claims that a decision is based on improper motives, except when the Administration refuses to disclose the reasons underlying the decision, the burden of proving any such allegations rests with the applicant.

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Belsito
Entity
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law