Ãå±±½ûµØ

- The contested decision is receivable because it affected the Applicant’s conditions of employment, and was the object of a timely management evaluation request. - There is no evidence on record that OAI’s investigation of the complaints against the Applicant was mishandled. In the circumstences surrounding the investigation, there were no unreasonable decisions made which were contrary to OAI’s Investigation Guidelines. The Applicant had his opportunity to refute all the allegations made, to question the circumstances and motivation behind the allegations, which he did. OAI’s decision that no independent review was warranted was legal and compliant with its obligations and discretion. - The Tribunal cannot initiate an investigation against employees of another International Organization. - There was no evidence leading to establish that the allegations of sexual misconduct against the Applicant were malicious or linked to a retaliation for his whistle-blower role in alleging corruption in the Russian GEF project.