Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2022/106

UNDT/2022/106, Nantumbwe

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The ASG/OHR considered all the relevant facts, and weighed the reasons provided by the Director of the RSCE. She considered the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s prior service on a temporary appointment, and the exception previously granted to the Applicant’s sister. 

The Respondent created no legitimate expectation that the exception previously granted to the Applicant’s sister would automatically result in the Applicant being later granted an exception, too; indeed, the derogation in the past had a different factual basis in the type and length of the relationship (and the temporary nature) of the first appointed relative; the Applicant’s sister was granted an exception because, amongst other things, the Applicant was on a temporary appointment at the time, meaning that the overlapping service of both sisters would only be for a limited time.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant challenged the refusal by the Administration to grant her an exception pursuant to staff rule 4.7(a) on the appointment of immediate family members within the Secretariat of the United Nations.

Legal Principle(s)

Staff rule 4.7 (a) categorically prohibits two individuals with family relationships such as mother, father, sister or brother to work for the Organization irrespective of reporting lines or location.

The Dispute Tribunal cannot consider the correctness of the choice made by the Secretary-General amongst the various courses of action open to him. Nor is it the role of the Tribunal to substitute its own decision for that of the Secretary-General.

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Nantumbwe
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type