UNDT/2022/113, Turk
The Tribunal found that there were several reasons why the application was not receivable: the impugned decision was merely a prefatory act , moreover, as such, it was sub judice in Case No. UNDT/NBI/2022/6. However, on a purely formal plane, the application had been filed out of time.
The Applicant was contesting a decision he described as "a request of appeal against discriminatory decision on 1 November 2021 of establishing so-called Comparative review Panel to select the staff member with lowest score, which was myself, as the entrenched staff member in light of the Secretary General request to downgrade a P4 position, which also proved to be fake. I was that victim of UNAMI`s leadership personal prejudices and self-motivated interests[.]"
Article 8(1)(i)(a) of the UNDT Statute stipulates that an application shall be receivable if, in cases where a management evaluation of the contested decision is required, it is filed within 90 calendar days of the applicant’s receipt of the response by management to his or her submission.