UNDT/2022/120, Blythe
The application is partly non-receivable and, is rejected on the merits. The Applicant’s objection to General Assembly’s decision to restructure the D-1 level position and to submit the selection of the Secretary of the Board to a competitive process by the Succession Planning Committee is not reviewable by the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the Applicant was afforded full and fair consideration and the non-selection decision was lawful. The Tribunal found that the USG/DMSPC lawfully assigned the Applicant to a suitable position in the Secretariat in order to retain his employment at the D-1 level position.
The Applicant, a staff member in the Department of Management, Strategy, Policy and Compliance (“DMSPC”), appealed (a) the rejection of his candidature for the post of Secretary of the Board of the United Nations Joint Staff Fund (“the Pension Fund”), and (b) his subsequent reassignment to a temporary post in DMSPC.
Decisions of the General Assembly do not constitute reviewable administrative decisions. The Appeals Tribunal has held that “[t]he General Assembly is the ultimate decision-making organ in the Organization and its decisions are not subject to challenge in the internal justice system” (see Kagizi 2017-UNAT-750).