UNDT/2023/129

UNDT/2023/129, Blais

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal observed that there was no dispute with respect to the material facts of the case. The Applicant was subject to an investigation and disciplinary process while employed at UNOPS, had his appointment terminated for misconduct, and did not disclose this information in his PHP when applying for the position at the UNLB, UNGSC.

The Applicant's attempts to justify his conduct were both illogical and not grounded on evidence.

False claims and misrepresentations of qualifications on PHPs constitute serious misconduct for violating the legal framework. The Applicant's conduct was not an accidental mistake, but a well-thought attempt at concealing relevant information, which undermined the integrity of the Organization’s recruitment process and could have potentially caused reputational damage. The disciplinary sanction was thus proportionate to the offence.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contests the decision to impose on him the disciplinary measure of separation from service, with compensation in lieu of notice and without termination indemnity, for having made misrepresentations and material omissions in his PHP.

Legal Principle(s)

In disciplinary cases, the role of the Dispute Tribunal is to examine whether the facts on which the sanction is based have been established, whether the established facts legally amount to misconduct, and whether the sanction is proportionate to the offence.

When termination is a possible outcome, misconduct must be established by clear and convincing evidence.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Blais

Entity

UNLB

Case Number(s)

UNDT/GVA/2022/019

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry Location :

Geneva