UNDT/2024/005

UNDT/2024/005, Amani

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that the application was not receivable in respect to the five contested decsions in the Applicant's application. The Tribunal found that, inter alia, the Applicant failed either to request management evaluation of a contested decision or because the Applicant’s management evaluation was time barred. With respect to contested decision 5, the Tribunal found that the application was not receivable ratione materiae because the Applicant had failed to clearly identify a reviewable administrative decision.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant, a former staff member with the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (“MINUSMA”), filed an application regarding the post-separation entitlements paid to him.

Legal Principle(s)

Under the consistent jurisprudence of the Appeals Tribunal, the Applicant must “identify an administrative decision capable of being reviewed” (Haydar 2018-UNAT-821).

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Amani

Entity

MINUSMA

Case Number(s)

UNDT/NY/2023/006

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry Location :

New York