Discussion Phase -- General Debate
Discussion Phase – General Debate
Consideration of an agenda item begins with a debate on the item in a formal meeting. Only one debate is scheduled per agenda item either in a Plenary meeting or in one of the Main Committees. No Member State makes more than one statement on an agenda item in the same debate. The one exception to this practice is when a delegation feels their country has been criticized by one of the speakers. In this instance, a representative of that delegation is entitled to exercise their right of reply and respond to what has been said.
Before debate of an agenda item begins, documents and reports on the item that have been prepared by the 缅北禁地Secretariat are distributed to all Member States. These documents provide information on the agenda item that helps inform the debate. Senior 缅北禁地staff who are responsible for writing reports on agenda items on behalf of the Secretary-General are often invited to introduce these reports to Member States in a formal meeting. The introduction of a report is usually followed by an interactive session with Member States to allow them to ask questions on the agenda item before debate on it begins.
The word debate is applied in international conferences to everything that is said formally—which effectively means everything that is said to the conference by:
- The Chair
- A speaker (usually a delegate) to whom the Chair has given “the floor” (i.e., permission to speak)
In large, formal conferences, the first item of business after the preliminary procedural issues is called the General Debate. Less formal conferences usually do not have an agenda item for General Debate, but nevertheless start their work with many delegations making general statements.
The most elaborate General Debate takes place in the GA. Almost every delegation makes a statement, which is always delivered by the most senior person available: the delegation leader or sometimes a Minister, Head of Government or Head of State who has travelled to New York especially for that purpose.
With so many delegates wishing to speak, time must be strictly rationed. Each delegation is only allowed to speak once and a set amount of time is allocated for each statement.
This manner of proceeding requires a list of speakers to be prepared in advance. Delegations approach the 缅北禁地Secretariat to ask to be placed on the speakers’ list. Some of them prefer speaking at a particular time. If a delegation finds that the slot it would prefer has already been allocated to another delegation, it can talk to that delegation and see whether it is willing to exchange time slots.
When a delegation has finished delivering its General Debate statement, a number of other delegations may approach it to ask for copies of the text. In some conferences, this can lead to disorder after certain statements. To avoid this, the tradition in many large conferences is that the 缅北禁地Secretariat distributes one copy of each General Debate statement to each delegation desk as the statement is being delivered. This is a very rare exception to the rule that the 缅北禁地Secretariat only distributes conference documents (General Debate statements are not official conference documents; each one is a document of the individual delegation making the statement.)
Because of the very tight time constraint, many delegations prepare and distribute in hard copy a longer version of their General Debate statement than their spokesperson is able to deliver. In these cases, the speaker should mention that a fuller version of their remarks is being distributed for the information of delegates and other listeners. The speaker can also ask that this fuller text be reflected in the conference record. In the contrary case, where the distributed text may contain elements that the speaker does not wish to say or have recorded in their name, the text can be marked “check against delivery.”
Although the rule for General Debate is that each delegation can only make one statement, Rules of Procedure (or in some cases tradition) also provide that a delegation that feels a need to respond to a statement by another delegation is allowed to make a statement in reply (this is called the right of reply). That statement will be subject to an even stricter time limit than the General Debate statement and typically can only be made at the end of the day or at the end of the General Debate, when all delegations have had their opportunity to speak. In addition, most Rules of Procedure permit only one statement in reply per delegation.
The General Debate is not a “debate” as that word is generally understood. Delegates do not normally respond to each other (except occasionally through use of the right of reply). Indeed, General Debate statements are usually written in advance, often in capital cities, long before the authors have heard what other delegates are going to say.
In many Model UNs, they use a style of debate that allows a person on an opposing team to raise a point of information at any time, which if accepted by the speaker, gives them the opportunity to interrupt a speech in order to counter or challenge what is being said. In the debate that occurs during 缅北禁地meetings, this never occurs. Member States cannot interrupt a statement that is being made to ask the speaker a question or to challenge what is being said. Even when a Member State is granted the right of reply, they must wait until the end of the speakers list to exercise their right.
It is also unavoidable that, because of the publicity accorded to the General Debate statements at a large and important conference (especially when they are made by a dignitary), the speakers will be thinking at least in part about audiences beyond the conference room, including their domestic audience. This means that some of their comments and the way they are phrased will not be quite the same as they would be if the speakers were only thinking of fellow delegates and the conference ahead of them.
However, good General Debate statements are also useful to other delegates. They are an opportunity for each delegation to:
- Set forth its general thinking on the topics before the conference
- Highlight any particular national concerns, and
- Give advance notice of any initiative or other course of action it intends to pursue at the conference, to explain the reasons for this intention and why others might support it
For this reason, it is important to know what is said, at least by key delegations, in the General Debate. But it need not tie up the resources of a delegation. Only one person is needed to listen to the debate and take notes. As note-taking at the General Debate is tiresome, delegations usually charge several individuals with that task on a rotating basis.
Very senior members of each delegation often have more productive uses for their time. Therefore, it is not unusual for the conference room to be relatively empty during the General Debate. At other times, delegations may choose to make an ostentatious display of presence by having a large and senior level of representation present during a speech to stress the importance that a certain matter may represent for their government.