Ãå±±½ûµØ

2010-UNAT-018, Mahdi

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

On appeal, the Appellant asserted that the Commissioner-General erred in not following the JAB’s recommendation. UNAT held that the JAB did not assess the totality of the evidence when making its recommendation. UNAT specifically held that the JAB’s recommendation that no clear policy or instruction prevented the Appellant from giving the individual the authorization to use the DSA Facility did not take into account that there was a clear policy to inform his supervisors, which the Appellant failed to do. UNAT accordingly dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to summarily dismiss him. The Commissioner-General of UNRWA rejected the Joint Appeals Board (JAB) recommendation and upheld the dismissal. The Commissioner-General held that the Applicant’s conduct amounted to willful and serious misuse of the UNRWA’s assets, rendering him liable to disciplinary measures, including summary dismissal.

Legal Principle(s)

A staff member’s clear violation of the Organisation’s policies may constitute misconduct warranting summary dismissal.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.