Ãå±±½ûµØ

2010-UNAT-052

2010-UNAT-052, Ardisson

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT held that the appeal was not filed untimely and was, therefore, receivable. UNAT held that, whatever the gravity of the irregularity committed by the Administration and the number of points obtained by the Applicant in the 2007 promotion session, UNDT did not commit an error in providing that the High Commissioner could decide to pay compensation rather than execute the rescission order. UNAT held that UNDT, in setting the amount of compensation at 8,000 Swiss francs, did not make a manifest error. UNAT held, concerning the conclusion that compensation should be paid for moral damages, that such a request could not be made for the first time on appeal. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees not to promote him to the P-5 level. UNDT rescinded the decision to refuse the Applicant promotion to the P-5 level and, alternatively, ordered compensation in lieu of executing the rescission order.

Legal Principle(s)

Compensation shall not normally exceed the equivalent of two years’ net base salary of the Applicant. In determining compensation, UNDT should bear in mind two considerations. The first is the nature of the irregularity that led to the rescission of the contested administrative decision. The second is an assessment of the staff member’s genuine prospects for promotion if the procedure had been regular.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Ardisson
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law