2010-UNAT-057, Fagundes
UNAT noted that when the new system was created, UNDT was not given powers to hear a matter already finally decided by the former Administrative Tribunal. UNAT accordingly held that UNDT was correct in finding that it did not have the power to review the decision of the former Administrative Tribunal. UNAT further held that the Appellant exhausted her avenues of appeal and that UNDT correctly found that it had no jurisdiction to hear another appeal. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.
UNDT judgment: The Applicant challenged the Administration’s violation of her due process rights, alleging harassment against her. She filed an appeal to the JAB and then an application with the former Administrative Tribunal. The former Administrative Tribunal rejected her application. The Applicant later filed a new application before UNDT. UNDT rejected her application, holding that the impugned decision was of judicial nature, as opposed to administrative, and, thus, did not fall within the competence of its jurisdiction.
UNDT does not have jurisdiction to hear matters previously decided by the former Administrative Tribunal.