2010-UNAT-071, Kovacevic
UNAT held that the Appellant failed to explain how UNDT exceeded or failed to exercise its jurisdiction or competence, erred on a question of law or procedure, or erred on a question of fact, resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision. UNAT recalled that the UNDT Statute precluded UNDT from suspending or waiving the deadlines for management evaluation. UNAT held that UNDT was therefore correct in concluding that the application was not receivable and to reject it on that basis. UNAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the UNDT Judgment.
The Applicant contested the decision to terminate her appointment as part of a drawdown plan. UNDT rejected her application as not receivable on grounds that the Applicant had failed to submit in a timely manner her request for a management evaluation of the administrative decision to terminate her appointment.
UNDT cannot suspend or waive the deadlines for management evaluation.