Ãå±±½ûµØ

2010-UNAT-082

2010-UNAT-082, Castelli

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT held that UNDT did not exceed its competence in ordering the payment of interest from the due date of the relocation grant, but that UNDT had erred in setting the interest rate at 8 per cent. UNAT held that both UNDT and UNAT must have the power to award interest in the normal course of ordering compensation. UNAT affirmed the UNDT judgment and Order No. 30 to the extent that UNDT awarded interest on the relocation grant and replaced the interest rate of 8 per cent with the United States prime rate applicable on 4 May 2008 (5 per cent).

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to pay him a relocation grant. UNDT found for the Applicant, a decision which was upheld by UNAT in judgment No. 2010-UNAT-037. Subsequently, in judgment No. UNDT/2010/011 and Order No. 30 (NY/2010), UNDT granted a request for payment of interest on the relocation grant at a rate of 8 per cent per annum from the due date of the relocation grant until the date of payment.

Legal Principle(s)

The absence of an express power to award interest in the UNDT Statute is not decisive. The award of interest by the tribunals is necessary to ensure that payments to staff are made by the Organisation. Both UNDT and UNAT must have the power to award interest in the normal course of ordering compensation.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Castelli
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law