2010-UNAT-096 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

2010-UNAT-096, Antaki

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered an appeal by the staff member. UNAT held that the evidence supported the conclusion that the decision not to appoint the Appellant was overall lawful and did not violate her rights. UNAT noted that the Appellant was not deprived of any significant chance of being promoted because there were other candidates ranked higher than her. UNAT held that the Appellant did not demonstrate any errors in the UNDT judgment regarding the merits of the administrative decision that would warrant UNAT’s intervention. UNAT held that the Appellant did not demonstrate that she was not properly represented before UNDT. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

UNDT judgment: The Applicant contested the decision not to appoint her to a P-5 post and claimed that she had been improperly excluded from the promotion. UNDT found that the decision not to appoint the Applicant to the P-5 position was valid and lawful. However, UNDT found that there was “inappropriate imprecision and confusion of the matrices” which contributed to the Applicant’s frustration and justified an award of compensation. UNDT awarded the Applicant the sum of USD 1,000.

Legal Principle(s)

An appeal is not an opportunity for the parties to reargue their case. It does not fall to UNAT to conduct a new trial.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Antaki

Entity

DGACM

Case Number(s)

2010-097

Tribunal

UNAT

Registry Location :

New York