2011-UNAT-101

2011-UNAT-101, Mezoui

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT had before it: an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2010-UNAT-043 on the issue of to which UNDT Registry UNAT remanded Ms Mezoui’s case; two appeals from UNDT Order Nos. 71 (GVA/2010) and 73 (GVA/2010); and a motion for joinder and fast-track hearing. UNAT held that the application for interpretation was a ruse to have UNAT interfere with UNDT’s assignment of venue. UNAT held that venue was a matter for the trial court’s discretion, with which it would not interfere. UNAT held that it would not, generally, entertain interlocutory appeals. UNAT denied the application for interpretation as unnecessary and interlocutory. UNAT denied the motion for joinder of interlocutory appeals and their fast-track hearing as interlocutory and moot. UNAT denied all of Ms Mezoui’s interlocutory appeals.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Previous UNAT judgment and UNDT orders: Ms Mezoui contested a determination by UNDT that her case was not receivable. In Judgment No. 2010-UNAT-043, UNAT remanded the case to UNDT for a hearing on the merits. In Order No. 71 (GVA/2010), UNDT ordered, inter alia, that the case be reopened, that a copy of a memorandum be transmitted to Ms Mezoui and that she must file a complete application to UNDT in Geneva by a certain date. In Order No. 73 (GVA/2010), UNDT rejected her motion for a change of venue.

Legal Principle(s)

Generally, UNAT will not entertain interlocutory appeals.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Mezoui

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry Location :