2012-UNAT-248

2012-UNAT-248, Iskandar

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT held that the Appellant had accepted the conditions of the RLA, which stated that “the loaned employee shall return to the releasing agency upon completion or termination of his assignment with UNAMID and that no offer of continuing employment shall be made to him by UNAMID without consulting the releasing agency”. UNAT held that the Appellant had had a valid employment contract with WFP, and he did not fulfil the conditions for termination under that same agreement. UNAT noted that the Appellant did not formally initiate the transfer procedure and/or termination. UNAT held that UNDT had not erred in finding that the Appellant was still on loan from WFP and that he could not be promoted to a UNAMID post unless he resigned from WFP. UNAT dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision denying him the opportunity to transfer from WFP to UNAMID as Principal Officer and refusing to remunerate him retroactively at the D-1 level from the time he had assumed his functions initially as Principal Officer and subsequently as Deputy Director (D-1) at UNAMID until his retirement. UNDT rejected the application finding that the Applicant had failed to establish that UNAMID had committed any fault. UNDT rejected the argument that during the period from 1 July 2009 to 26 January 2010 the Applicant was no longer on loan to UNAMID but was working for UNAMID under a secondment arrangement. UNDT found that the same reimbursable loan agreement (RLA) governed his relationship with UNAMID during the entire period of his service. UNDT also found that any possible confusion created by UNAMID about whether the Applicant had been selected for the D-1 level post was clarified by an email of 8 June 2009, which made it clear that the Applicant could not be promoted to a UNAMID post unless he resigned from WFP. UNDT further found that the Applicant had not formally requested UNAMID to initiate the transfer procedure provided in the Inter-Organisation Agreement.

Legal Principle(s)

A contract is formed by an unconditional agreement between the parties on the terms and conditions for the appointment, before issuance of the letter of appointment, if all the conditions for the offer are met by the candidate. The conditions for an offer should be understood as all those mentioned in the offer, those arising from the relevant rules of law for the appointment of staff members of the Organisation and those necessarily associated with constraints in the implementation of public policies entrusted to the Organisation.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Iskandar
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type