2015-UNAT-606, Hayek
As a preliminary matter, UNAT found that there were no exceptional circumstances to warrant the granting of the Appellant’s motion for leave to file a reply to the Commissioner-General’s answer and denied the motion. UNAT held that the UNRWA’s findings that the application was not receivable ratione temporis because it was filed more than three years after the receipt of the termination decision and that UNRWA DT had no discretion to waive the regulatory time limit of three years, were unassailable. UNAT held that UNRWA DT correctly found that the application was not receivable ratione materiae. On the Commissioner-General’s request for an award of costs, UNAT held that while the appeal was frivolous, it was not an abuse of process and therefore denied the request for an award of costs. UNAT denied the appeal and affirmed the UNRWA DT judgment.
The Applicant contested the decision to terminate his appointment. UNRWA DT dismissed the application as not receivable ratione materiae and ratione temporis.
An application to UNRWA DT is not receivable if it is filed more than three years after the applicant’s receipt of the contested administrative decision and UNRWA DT has no discretion to waive this time limit.