2015-UNAT-607

2015-UNAT-607, Zakharov

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT held that the decision of the UNJSPB not to submit the staff member’s appeal to the Standing Committee contravened his rights under the UNJSPF Regulations by depriving him of access to the appeals process and was a serious violation of his due process rights. Noting that UNAT’s jurisdiction was limited to hearing appeals of decisions of the Standing Committee and that the staff member’s case had not been reviewed by the Standing Committee, UNAT held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal and remanded it to the Standing Committee.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The staff member challenged the UNJSPB’s refusal to submit his case to the Standing Committee. He claimed that the decision violated the “international civil servants’ right of appeal” and applied the UNJSPF Regulations in an “arbitrary, unfair or prejudicial manner”.

Legal Principle(s)

UNAT’s jurisdiction over the UNJSPF is limited to hearing appeals of decisions of the Standing Committee of the UNJSPB.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Zakharov
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type