2016-UNAT-641

2016-UNAT-641, Chemingui

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered an interlocutory appeal by the Secretary-General. UNAT held that UNDT did not “clearly exceed its competence or jurisdiction” when it temporarily suspended the administrative decision to laterally reassign the staff member as that decision did not constitute a case of “appointment, promotion, or termination” excluded from interim relief under Article 10. 2 of the UNDT Statute. Accordingly, UNAT dismissed the interlocutory appeal as not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The staff member contested the decision to laterally reassign him and requested a suspension of action. UNDT issued an order granting the staff member’s request for suspension of action pending resolution of the matter.

Legal Principle(s)

A lateral reassignment decision does not constitute a case of appointment, promotion, or termination. Therefore, it is subject to interim relief under Article 10. 2 of the UNDT Statute.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on receivability

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.