Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNAT considered whether UNRWA DT made an error of fact, resulting in an unreasonable decision when it found that the Appellant submitted her request for decision review. UNAT found that the evidence showed that UNRWA DT did not make a factual error when it found that the request for decision review was made on 7 July 2014. UNAT noted that, as the request for decision review was submitted on 7 July 2014, the time for the Appellant to file an application for judicial review expired 120 days thereafter, on 4 November 2014. UNAT found that the Appellant’s application for judicial review was not filed until 5 December 2014, which was over one month late. UNAT accordingly held that UNRWA DT correctly concluded that the application was not receivable ratione temporis. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed UNRWA DT’s judgment.