2017-UNAT-710, Tarr
UNAT held that UNDT did not err on a question of law or fact and had identified the relevant administrative decision to trigger the time limits for a request for management evaluation. UNAT held there was no legal difference between an assignment and a reassignment. UNAT held that the Appellant’s argument that two different administrative decisions were notified to her was without merit. UNAT held that the Appellant’s argument that a communication of entitlements and benefits cannot constitute a notification of the underlying administrative decision concerning status was without merit. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.
The Applicant contested the decision not to pay her a number of benefits and entitlements following her reassignment to Uganda due to an outbreak of Ebola in Liberia. UNDT rejected her application as not receivable because she had failed to contest the terms of her reassignment by requesting management evaluation within sixty days.
Left deliberately blank
Th