2017-UNAT-789, Barakat
UNAT held that the Appellant had not complied with his obligations under Article 2(1) of the UNAT Statute. UNAT held that there were no errors of law, fact, or procedure in the UNRWA DT judgment. UNAT held that under the relevant Circular, the Administration only had a duty to consider the Appellant’s request to be transferred to a certain compound, but not his wish to be transferred to a certain school located in that compound. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNRWA DT Judgment.
The Applicant contested the decision to deny his request for a transfer. UNRWA DT dismissed the case in its entirety.
The function of UNAT is to determine if the first instance tribunal has made errors of fact or law, exceeded its jurisdiction or competence, or failed to exercise its jurisdiction, as prescribed in Article 2(1) of the UNAT Statute. The appellant has the burden of satisfying UNAT that the judgment rendered by the first instance tribunal is defective.
No relief ordered; No relief ordered.