2020-UNAT-1026, Diallo
UNAT considered an application revision of judgment No. 2019-UNAT-936 by Mr Diallo. UNAT held that Mr Diallo failed to establish the statutory conditions that had to be fulfilled before a judgment could be revised, namely there was no discovery of a decisive fact which was, at the time the judgment was rendered, unknown to UNAT and to him. UNAT held that an application for revision of a judgment that does not meet the statutory prerequisites cannot be a collateral means of attack on the judgment or allowed to be the second right of final appeal. UNAT dismissed the application for revision.
Mr. Diallo contested the termination of his appointment for unsatisfactory performance. In judgment No. 2019-UNAT-936, UNAT affirmed the UNDT judgment No. 2019/UNDT/002 which had dismissed his application as not receivable for failure to request management evaluation prior to submitting the application to UNDT.
An application for revision of a judgment that does not meet the statutory prerequisites cannot be a collateral means of attack on the judgment or allowed to be the second right of final appeal.
Eng