2020-UNAT-1028, El Najjar
Absent any evidence of any improper motive or irrational consideration, and given the bonafide and operational necessity to restructure, there was no basis to conclude that the UNRWA Commissioner-General acted unreasonably. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNRWA DT judgment.
The staff member contested the non-renewal of his fixed-term appointment. UNDT held that, in the face of a financial crisis, it was within UNRWA Commissioner-General’s discretionary authority to restructure, abolish posts, create new posts and redeploy staff and that he had exercised his discretion reasonably in the circumstances.
A fixed-term appointment has no expectation of renewal or conversion to another type of appointment. An administrative decision not to renew a fixed-term appointment can be challenged on the grounds of legality, reasonableness, and procedural fairness. If an exercise of discretion by the UNRWA Commissioner-General is legal, rational, procedurally correct, and proportionate, there will be no basis for interference by UNAT.
No relief ordered; No relief ordered.