2020-UNAT-1034, El Sehemawi
UNAT held that AJAB’s interim report did not constitute a neutral first instance process which included a written record and a written decision providing reasons, fact and law and as such, did not conform to the requirements of Article 2(10) of the UNAT Statute or the Agreement between the Ãå±±½ûµØand ICAO. UNAT held that at ICAO there was no neutral first instance process including a decision. UNAT held that the Secretary-General of ICAO, who issued the contested decision, was not neutral, but a party to proceedings. UNAT held that under such circumstances it was not satisfied that the essential elements of a neutral first instance process were present to have constituted a decision that could be appealed to UNAT. UNAT remanded the case to AJAB for a neutral first instance process producing a binding decision with reasons, a statement of the relevant facts, and the relevant law.
Mr. El Sehemawi contested the decision of the Secretary-General of ICAO to concur with the findings of the Advisory Joint Appeals Board (AJAB) that Mr. El Sehemawi had not identified an administrative decision capable of being reviewed.
A neutral first instance process that includes a written decision must exist in order to constitute a decision that is appealable to UNAT.