2022-UNAT-1278 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

2022-UNAT-1278, Langa Dorji

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The UNAT considered an appeal by Mr. Dorji.

The UNAT found that the appeal was defective in that it failed to identify any of the five grounds of appeal set out in Article 2(1) of the Statute as forming the legal basis of the appeal. As the UNDT correctly held, Mr. Dorji’s alleged coerced resignation and subsequent separation from the Organization occurred in March and April 2019. Mr. Dorji’s request for management evaluation thereof was filed outside the 60-day statutory time limit by more than two years, on 25 June 2021.

The UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed Judgment No. UNDT/2021/120.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Mr. Dorji contested the decision to accept his resignation.

The UNDT, by Judgment No. UNDT/2021/120, summarily dismissed the application, finding that it was non-receivable ratione materiae.

Legal Principle(s)

A party appealing a judgment of the UNDT is unlikely to succeed in having the judgment reversed, modified or the case remanded to the UNDT unless the appeal challenges the impugned judgment on one or more of the grounds referred to in Article 2(1)(a) to (e) of the UNAT Statute.

An application shall be receivable if the applicant has previously submitted the contested decision for management evaluation where required. The UNAT has repeatedly and consistently strictly enforced the time limits for filing applications and appeals. Strict adherence to filing deadlines assures one of the goals of the new system of administration of justice: the timely hearing of cases and rendering of judgments.

The UNAT has also consistently held that staff members are presumed to know the Regulations and Rules applicable to them. It is the staff member’s responsibility to ensure that he or she is aware of the applicable procedure in the context of the administration of justice at the United Nations. Ignorance cannot be invoked as an excuse.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Langa Dorji

Entity

UNJSPF

Case Number(s)

2021-1624

Tribunal

UNAT

Registry Location :

New York