Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2009/004

UNDT/2009/004, Fradin de Bell

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Unlawfulness: There has to be evidence to establish that, at the very least, it is probable that the non-renewal decision of itself was unlawful. Irreparable harm: Harm is irreparable if it can be shown that suspension of the action is the only way to ensure that the applicant’s rights are observed. Although the applicant has expectation of fair treatment, any breach of due process in this case is capable of being compensated financially or by correction of the performance record. Should he be ultimately vindicated, he can get compensation for any losses arising out of defects in the performance management applied to him. Outcome: The application was dismissed.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The applicant contested the 22 May 2009 decision not to extend his appointment of limited duration beyond its expiry date of 31 July 2009. The applicant applied for a suspension of action, pending the outcome of management evaluation, on the decision not to extend his appointment of limited duration beyond its expiry date of 31 July 2009. He also requested that his contract be renewed until the rebuttal process is completed and, if the outcome is not satisfactory to him, until there is a hearing on the merits of the case by the Tribunal (the rebuttal process was ongoing at the time of the filing of the suspension of action application).

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Fradin de Bell
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type