UNDT/2009/004, Fradin de Bell
Unlawfulness: There has to be evidence to establish that, at the very least, it is probable that the non-renewal decision of itself was unlawful. Irreparable harm: Harm is irreparable if it can be shown that suspension of the action is the only way to ensure that the applicant’s rights are observed. Although the applicant has expectation of fair treatment, any breach of due process in this case is capable of being compensated financially or by correction of the performance record. Should he be ultimately vindicated, he can get compensation for any losses arising out of defects in the performance management applied to him. Outcome: The application was dismissed.
The applicant contested the 22 May 2009 decision not to extend his appointment of limited duration beyond its expiry date of 31 July 2009. The applicant applied for a suspension of action, pending the outcome of management evaluation, on the decision not to extend his appointment of limited duration beyond its expiry date of 31 July 2009. He also requested that his contract be renewed until the rebuttal process is completed and, if the outcome is not satisfactory to him, until there is a hearing on the merits of the case by the Tribunal (the rebuttal process was ongoing at the time of the filing of the suspension of action application).
N/A