Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2009/089, Wilkinson et al

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Although a series of resolutions of the General Assembly authorized the Secretary-General (provided a number of conditions were fulfilled) to reappoint under the I00 series of the Staff Rules mission staff whose service under 300 series contracts had reached the four-year limit, there had never been any legal obligation to do so. Even if the principles of Handelsman were applied to this case, no express promise for converting the appointments could be found. Furthemore the Applicants failed to exhaust internal remedies in a timely manner, since they did not initiate formal proceedings against the nonconversion although they had the opportunity to do, so. Instead they accepted and signed, without qualification, a series of appointments under the 300 series.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicants, all former staff members of UNMIK, served for more than four years under 300 series of former Staff Rules and request to receive termination benefits equivalent to those paid to staff employed under the 100 series. They claim that the Administration had a legal obligation to convert their appointments from the 300 series to the 100 series and refer to several documents they regard as assurances and promises to do so.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Wilkinson et al
Entity
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type