Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2011/105

UNDT/2011/105, Al-Mulla

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Management evaluation: Claims against decisions that have not been the subject of a request for management evaluation are not receivable before the Tribunal. An applicant may not seek any rulings or relief in relation to these decisions. The events surrounding them may be part of the factual matrix of the application but they are peripheral at best. Project document: There is no mandatory requirement in the rules or any Administrative Instructions for a project document to be finalised prior to the responsible staff member taking up the project post. Authority for lateral transfers under ST/AI/2006/3: This Administrative Instruction concerns the staff selection system and sets out the procedures applicable from the beginning to the end of the selection process. However paragraph 2.4, which is derived from staff regulation 1.2(c), expressly reserves the authority to laterally transfer staff members to the head of department. Authority to withdraw a lateral transfer: A decision to withdraw a reassignment is within the broad discretion of the head of department.Outcome: Application rejected on the merits

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant accepted a lateral transfer at the P-4 level from Vienna to Abu Dhabi; however, some eight months after the offer was made to him and some six months after he formally accepted it, the Applicant had still not relocated to Abu Dhabi. Despite repeated requests by the Respondent that he should take up his post without delay, he kept raising various issues and postponing his departure. Eventually, the Respondent decided to withdraw the decision to laterally reassign the Applicant. He contests the latter decision.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Al-Mulla
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type