Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2011/208

UNDT/2011/208, Ljungdell

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal examined whether the compensation granted to her by the Respondent was adequate to provide reparation for the damage she suffered as a result of the irregularities committed. The Tribunal found that none of her allegations was proven. It considered that the Applicant did not suffer any material damage as a result of the contested decision and that the compensation already given to her was sufficient to repair any moral damage. Selection procedure: It is for the Administration to determine the suitability of each candidate and the Tribunal should not substitute its judgment to that of the Secretary-General in the assessment of a candidate’s suitability for a given post. Only in rare circumstances, such as failure to give fair consideration to a candidate, discrimination of bias, departure from proper procedure and failure to consider relevant material, may the Tribunal rescind a selection decision. Burden of proof: The party who alleges a fact bears in principle the burden of proving its veracity. Outcome: Application rejected on the merits

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contests the High Commissioner’s decision not to select her for a post at the P-5 level.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Ljungdell
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type