Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2012/076

UNDT/2012/076, Ouellet

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Certification of sick leave: If some staff members as a matter of practice communicated directly with the MSD rather than through their mission, such practice does not detract from or modify written legislation.Recognised regional medical centres: A country in serious political, economic and security situation was unlikely to be the place to seek adequate medical treatment for an ailment recognised by the organization as a condition for medical evacuation. Recovery of overpayment: The United Nations being a humanitarian organization and in providing humanitarian assistance worldwide, needs to be mindful of its staff members, who work towards fulfilling the organization’s mandate for a better world. To expect a staff member, working in a mission area, far removed from his home country, to receive no pay at all at the end of each month for whatever reason, is unfair and unconscionable. The Tribunal found that the Applicant had fulfilled the requirements for his application for sick leave approval and that the decision not to certify 7 months of the Applicant’s sick leave was due to administrative delays. The Applicant in the circumstances was entitled to the maximum approval of sick leave available to him under his contract of employment. The Tribunal also found that the certification of sick leave for the period that the Applicant was well and healthy was unwarranted action designed to cover up the shortcomings of the managers who had failed to medically clear the Applicant to return to duty.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to place him on SLWOP for an extended period of sick leave so as to recover overpayments of the emoluments her received during that period.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.