Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2012/140, Ullah

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Assessment of prima facie unlawfulness: In the course of suspension of action proceedings sufficient proof of the facts must be presented in view of the strict time limits governing the suspension of action procedure.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant, on secondment from Government service, submitted an application for suspension of action, pending management evaluation, of the decision not to extend his fixed-term appointment on the grounds of his performance, as well as, an undetermined OIOS investigation. In alleging that the contested decision is prima facie unlawful, he challenged the reasons provided for the non-renewal in light of his ePAS records assessing his performance with no show of instances of difficulties and/or shortcomings. The Tribunal finds that the Respondent did not adduce sufficient evidence and facts on which the decision of non-renewal can be based and granted the suspension of action.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

Suspension of action granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.