UNDT/2013/036, Arigi-Oikelomen
Due process: The evaluation of the Applicant’s performance for the 2008/2009 reporting cycle was not carried out in accordance with the established procedures and materially discredits the Respondent’s case. UNON had an obligation to defer the non-renewal decision until the rebuttal process had been completed but failed to do so. This was a violation of the Applicant’s due process rights. Bad faith: The negative relationship between the Applicant’s former FRO and SRO was contributory to the non- renewal of the Applicant’s contract. The Applicant’s SRO demonstrated ill-motive and unethical conduct when, after the Applicant’s separation from service, she decided to personally “investigate†the Applicant’s qualifications. Her efforts to introduce the purported results of this investigation into evidence constituted an abuse of the process of the Tribunal.
The Applicant is contesting a decision dated 16 September 2009 separating her from service on 1 November 2009 on the basis of performance shortcomings.
N/A
Both financial comp. and specific performance