UNDT/2013/047, Khisa
Failure to file a reply: The Tribunal held that when a Reply is due in accordance with art. 10.1 of the UNDT Rules, the Respondent is required to comply with his obligation. He may not choose to file a Motion to have receivability considered as a preliminary issue or any other motion in lieu of his Reply. Subsequently, the only available remedy for the Respondent who fails to file a reply within the prescribed timeline is to seek leave of the Tribunal to be entitled to take part in the proceedings. Summary judgment: Noting that under art. 19 of the UNDT Rules, a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law only where the material facts of a case are not in dispute, the Tribunal held that summary judgment was appropriate in this case in light of the fact that the Respondent failed to submit a reply on the merits and as such, there was no dispute as to the material facts. The Tribunal was therefore entitled to rely solely on the Applicant’s pleadings in reaching its final decision.
The Applicant contested the decision to evict her from her United Nations provided accommodation in Torit.
N/A
In light of the Tribunal’s conclusion that the Applicant’s due process and human rights were violated by UNMISS Administration and due to the egregiousness of the violation, the Respondent is ordered to pay the Applicant six months net base salary, at the rate applicable as of the date of this judgment, as compensation.