Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2013/120, Applicant

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The withdrawal request was filed more than two years after the initial application and prior to it the Applicant never requested a joinder of the present case and Case No. UNDT/NY/2012/070. The Applicant did not present sufficient legal grounds to grant his request for joinder. Although the Tribunal no longer needs to make a determination on the merits, the present decision represents a final disposal of the matter and the Tribunal will consider it withdrawn in finality, including on the merits. The application is dismissed in its entirety without liberty to reinstate. There are no exceptional circumstances which can justify a measure to preserve the confidentiality of evidence such as placing under seal all the documents included in the case file upon the withdrawal of the application. Furthermore, case files are kept confidential and are not available to the public notwithstanding an order from the Tribunal. The request for the documents contained within the case file be placed under seal is to be rejected. Taking into consideration that the Applicant has withdrawn his case, and in line with his right to privacy, his name his to be redacted from the Judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contests the decision to impose on him the disciplinary sanction of a written censure. Prior to the issuance of the judgment the Applicant filed a motion requesting: 1) the joinder of the present case with Case No. UNDT/NY/2012/070; 2) the withdrawal of his application for these cases; 3) that the documents in both cases be sealed to preserve the confidentiality of the Applicant.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Closed on withdrawal

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Applicant
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Document Topic/Theme :
Applicable Law