Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2013/129

UNDT/2013/129, Al-Mulla

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

In that judgment, the Tribunal had inter alia found that the decision to require the Applicant to revert to his initial P-3 post had not been the subject of a management evaluation and consequently was not receivable. He requested the Tribunal to vacate certain paragraphs of the judgment. The Tribunal held that for a request for revision to be successful, all the requirements in art.12.1 of its Statute have to be met.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant is a staff member of UNODC. On 3 July 2013, he filed an application for revision of judgment UNDT/2011/105.

Legal Principle(s)

Negligence: The Applicant’s lack of awareness of the importance of the need for the decisive fact to have been clearly adduced at the hearing can only be attributed to his negligence or that of his counsel advising him throughout the proceedings. Request for revision: Request for revision is only receivable if it is made within the appropriate time frame.

Outcome
Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Al-Mulla
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type