UNDT/2013/158, Nwuke
The Tribunal concluded that: (a) the selection process for the post of D/ACGSD was not handled correctly and lawfully due to apparent bias on the part of the ASP and that he suffered prejudice/damage as a result; and (b) the Applicant was not the victim of harassment and discrimination in relation to this case. Bias: The Tribunal held that the test for apparent bias is whether the fair-minded observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that the Interview Panel was biased. The Tribunal concluded that the Advisory Selection Panel (ASP) in the present matter was biased against the Applicant as a result of negative information about him that had come into the ASP’s possession prior to the interview.
The Applicant challenged his non-selection for the post of Director, African Centre for Gender and Social Development (D/ACGSD) at ECA and alleged that the filling of the post was motivated by improper motive, prejudice, retaliation and discrimination.
N/A
The Tribunal awarded the Applicant two months net base salary for moral damages.