UNDT/2013/173

UNDT/2013/173, Al-Mulla

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal rejected the application and awarded costs for abuse of process.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant is a staff member of UNODC. On 3 July 2013, he filed an application for revision of judgment UNDT/2013/046 which had been issued on 8 March 2013. In his application, he considers as new and decisive facts some statements the Respondent had originally made on 24 February 2012 in one of the Applicant's other cases.

Legal Principle(s)

Decisive fact: A fact which was known to the Applicant by the time of the rendering of the judgment sought to be reviewed cannot be considered as a new and decisive fact within the meaning of the rules governing the procedure of revision.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Al-Mulla

Entity

UNODC

Case Number(s)

UNDT/GVA/2013/45

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry Location :

Geneva