Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2014/041

UNDT/2014/041, von der Schulenberg

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNDT held that the Application was receivable on the ground that a decision not to select a candidate for a post is an administrative decision within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. UNDT held that the Application was not res judicata. UNDT noted that the issue in the present case regarded a different administrative decision from the one deemed not receivable in a previous Judgment (Case No. UNDT/NBI/2013/014). UNDT held that the Applicant had knowledge of the decision not to appoint him to the Special Representative of the Secretary-General post on 22 May 2013 and that time for a request for management evaluation began to run from that date. As the request was not made until 7 October 2013, it was well out of the 60 day time limit. UNDT held that the Application was not receivable on this ground. UNDT held that the Application was not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to select, not to extend, not to renew, not to reassign and not to re-appoint him in a senior United Nations position.

Legal Principle(s)

A decision not to select a candidate for a post is an administrative decision within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. An applicant has 60 days to request a management evaluation of a decision from the date of the contested or the date when the Applicant had knowledge of the decision. That evaluation is a mandatory pre-requisite for a case to be properly brought to the Tribunal. The time limit for requesting management evaluation may not be waived or extended by the Tribunal.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
von der Schulenberg
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type