�山����

The Tribunal found that clear and convincing evidence was obtained which was consistent with the Applicant’s sexually exploiting local women and the impugned decision was well-founded. The Applicant had claimed that he had given his username and password to other staff members therefore, he could not be attributed the accessing and storing of the material. The Tribunal did accept this. The Applicant admitted that he had downloaded and installed the cracked software that had caused pornographic material to appear on his computer. He neither named any person with whom he shared the password nor for what specific purpose there would have been for such a sharing. The frequency of accessing the pornographic material under the Applicant’s user name, storing it in his “documents” folder and an attempt at accessing a pornographic site from the Applicant’s private account render it highly improbable that this would have been done by others without his acquiescence. Had indeed anyone else been given access to the Applicant’s official laptop and used it to access pornographic material, the Applicant tolerated it which rendered him complicit. The Tribunal found that the relevant facts were established by clear and convincing evidence, that the Respondent properly found that the conduct amounted to misconduct and that there were no violations of the procedure that might have had impact on these findings. The Tribunal furthermore found that the disciplinary measure that was meted out was not disproportionate and indeed consistent with the established practice and the jurisprudence of the Appeals Tribunal.