Ãå±±½ûµØ

UNDT/2020/200

UNDT/2020/200, Aslam

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNDT held that the application was receivable ratione materiae under Staff Rule 11.2(c) and Article 81.(c) of the UNDT Statute. The Applicant submitted and Appendix D claim on 4 December 2019 and a decision was made and communicated to him on 10 December 2019. He submitted that decision for management evaluation in accordance with Staff Rule 11.2(c) and Article 8.1(c) of the UNDT Statute. UNDT held that the 6 June 2019 email, in which the Advisory Board on Compensation Claims (ABCC) thanked the Applicant for bringing a matter to its attention, was not in response to a compensation claim by the Applicant and did not therefore constitute a decision to reject his claim for compensation. The Applicant was correct in not submitting it for management evaluation. UNDT held that the Application was not moot. UNDT held that the Application involved a live issue upon which it was competent to pass judgment, given that the ABCC on all occasions only considered the issue of receivability and not the merits of the Applicant’s claim.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the Respondent’s decision to reject as time-barred his claim for compensation under Appendix D of the United Nations Staff Rules and Regulations. This decision was made by the Claims and Entitlements team at the Kuwait Joint Support Office (KJSO).

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Aslam
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type