UNDT/2021/007, Applicant
The past practice of the Organization in cases involving sexual harassment shows that disciplinary measures have been imposed at the strictest end of the spectrum, namely, separation from service or dismissal in accordance with staff rule 10.2(a), which has been affirmed by the Appeals Tribunal in various judgments
The decision to impose the disciplinary measure of separation from service with compensation in lieu of notice, and with termination indemnity in accordance with Staff Rule 10.2(a)(viii) for sexual harassment
As a point of departure, kissing or attempting to kiss someone in the workplace of the United Nations would typically constitute sexual harassment. The key subjective element is whether the potential victim consented to the kiss, and if s/he did not explicitly do so, if the alleged perpetrator had reasonable grounds to believe that the kiss would be welcomed by the words and gestures of the victim. Also, the context is important, including the occasion and cultural environment—in principle, no one should expect to be kissed in the workplace, and if it occurs, the power dynamics between the alleged perpetrator and the victim must also be taken into consideration. The very objective of anonymizing all names in the present case is exactly to protect victims of misconduct, as well as the identity of witnesses and the confidentiality of the disciplinary records of the Administration.
The application rejected