�山����

To be capable of appeal, an administrative decision must produce direct legal consequences affecting a staff member’s conditions of employment. The Administration’s decision not to complete a disciplinary process against a staff member and instead resume it should the staff member become a staff member again did not constitute an appealable administrative decision under art. 2.1 of the Dispute Tribunal’s Statute. The Administration has no duty to proceed with, and lacks the capacity to conduct, a disciplinary measure once a staff member has left the Organization, as its authority to complete a disciplinary process is predicated on the fact that a staff member has an ongoing employment relationship with the Organization. The key characteristics of an administrative decision subject to judicial review is that the decision must “produce direct legal consequences” affecting a staff member’s terms or conditions of appointment, not a “future injury”. A note placed in a staff member’s Official Status File recording the Administration’s decision not to complete a disciplinary process was not reviewable, because it did not produce direct legal consequences in the staff member’s employment rights because it was merely informative in nature.